public inbox for pgsql-general@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Wei Wang (Fujitsu) <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Shi (Fujitsu) <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>
Cc: Runqi Tian <runqidev@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: li jie <ggysxcq@gmail.com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Cc: rajesh singarapu <rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 06:56:42 +0900
Message-ID: <ZIjmGhPWdoJUfjjE@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4eK1J8WOK9VZ9RpQRNRhRYhFOKQCu=GLCu+iBOePNO3JwLbQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <OSZPR01MB63102C42A24D59FACF6D9CD6FD4A9@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAJpy0uCbwqWj+p_yj1AHyiufzAUv_H29qOaztAXxFoTqZ9WcAw@mail.gmail.com>
<OSZPR01MB6310E0509F229AF2A9414BB1FD499@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAJpy0uBwCZCniPR6vh26L+wpSf4xzUN8omUa9DzF-x1CAud_xA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1LOr+2O+_pWKTaa0y9vbW6whfm-8-fuBvnS6OBiaR+7TA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1LF3EaCSj5iqO0oT1k3ew7YnQbbKEgbzORDAdvdtd+r7w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJpy0uDtrxPo127LH3FP-TffynrspPFqhhC7o_GFOMP+2mPtWQ@mail.gmail.com>
<OS3PR01MB6275328379FBE5734B4585619E54A@OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<ZIgf3qBvFoTsMhIc@paquier.xyz>
<CAA4eK1J8WOK9VZ9RpQRNRhRYhFOKQCu=GLCu+iBOePNO3JwLbQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 06:49:42PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> We have to choose one of the approaches between 0001 and 0008. I feel
> we don't need an intermediate ObjTree representation as that adds
> overhead and an additional layer which is not required. As mentioned
> in my previous email I think as a first step we should merge 0001 and
> 0008 and avoid having an additional ObjTree layer unless you or others
> feel we need it. I think that will reduce the overall patch size and
> help us to focus on one of the approaches.
Similar impression here. I found ObjTree actually confusing compared
to the JSON blobs generated.
> Surely, as suggested by
> you, we should also evaluate if we can generate this code for the
> various command types.
Thanks.
--
Michael
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (833B, 2-signature.asc)
download
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, amit.kapila16@gmail.com, wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com, shveta.malik@gmail.com, shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com, vignesh21@gmail.com, houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com, itsajin@gmail.com, runqidev@gmail.com, smithpb2250@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, ggysxcq@gmail.com, dilipbalaut@gmail.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, sawada.mshk@gmail.com, japinli@hotmail.com, rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, zhengli10@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
In-Reply-To: <ZIjmGhPWdoJUfjjE@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox