public inbox for pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Does included columns part of the PK
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 18:11:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+FnnTyH7Hp2tO03UnLE_cpZ_rerdttV02_gVBxM5jiz3Z2GSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e612ab0e-37c9-4dc2-8cec-9c5fe9baf284@aklaver.com>
References: <CA+FnnTz7+dbyk5Gn2iM-eo1Xvfax15yjBevmCCfvo0-UVW1K7Q@mail.gmail.com>
<b3f6ecfb-8772-4e15-a772-8e64fb573d49@aklaver.com>
<CAKFQuwYswndGOm6vnsoNSTWHEC5d29bvYokymtDEY_cyW54FEQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+FnnTyFVn4Ebx9kP-5vooZwpATwV5Euc8Nt6TGmEuR6oDYd9A@mail.gmail.com>
<3547f40b-08b9-4d0c-bba8-f1c26d0bf09d@aklaver.com>
<CA+FnnTwLvp1wweqWJkw1+sg4x+pM_oGVmfc-3TaPpE_557=A_A@mail.gmail.com>
<2c31c118-7f8a-4359-9c4f-4cabd9df4262@aklaver.com>
<CA+FnnTx5WZeYwg-OFwvbipvHRJP263UP8EVNY0aGMu6E_XuKsQ@mail.gmail.com>
<7461c77a-4536-4f53-b951-99b9ca33db79@aklaver.com>
<CA+FnnTw+HhguiTO27hzTUTU6uRBY_wRRwB=xT+7=t_0CdrCsoA@mail.gmail.com>
<105a9d1a-c219-401a-9b81-4d77dde901f5@aklaver.com>
<da939085-813e-4505-880d-aafa91c8509d@aklaver.com>
<CA+FnnTxh0ZvsaKvkpg7OLQBVhhicsv2u+uk9d0jf+qmF5q=YTw@mail.gmail.com>
<f61e570d-73a2-49b2-a612-09d94e9f794e@aklaver.com>
<CA+FnnTzXK876siRuPhqav59SmzTSZUYmo9vGqffRn8g0Vr9f8Q@mail.gmail.com>
<e612ab0e-37c9-4dc2-8cec-9c5fe9baf284@aklaver.com>
Adrian,,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 5:44 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/16/26 4:38 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
> > Adrian,
> >
> > Most important - do you agree that those fields should not be in this
> > recordset?
>
> I don't see anything here:
>
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/odbc/reference/syntax/sqlprimarykeys-function?view=sql-server-...
>
> that says they should be returned. Though the above also says:
>
> " Additional columns beyond column 6 (PK_NAME) can be defined by the
> driver."
>
> That is not the case here, where additional rows are used. However it
> does allow for more information to be supplied.
>
> My purely un-expert analysis is, no the extra rows should not be there.
Thx for confirming.
I already forwarded the email with the query results over to ODBC list.
Hopefully someone can come back soon.
Are you reading that list as well? If not I will update this thread
with the results.
Thank you.
>
> >
> > Thank you.
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Cc: ikorot01@gmail.com, adrian.klaver@aklaver.com, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Does included columns part of the PK
In-Reply-To: <CA+FnnTyH7Hp2tO03UnLE_cpZ_rerdttV02_gVBxM5jiz3Z2GSg@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox