public inbox for pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com>
To: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Does included columns part of the PK
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 09:56:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+FnnTyFVn4Ebx9kP-5vooZwpATwV5Euc8Nt6TGmEuR6oDYd9A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKFQuwYswndGOm6vnsoNSTWHEC5d29bvYokymtDEY_cyW54FEQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+FnnTz7+dbyk5Gn2iM-eo1Xvfax15yjBevmCCfvo0-UVW1K7Q@mail.gmail.com>
<b3f6ecfb-8772-4e15-a772-8e64fb573d49@aklaver.com>
<CAKFQuwYswndGOm6vnsoNSTWHEC5d29bvYokymtDEY_cyW54FEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 14, 2026 at 8:51 AM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, March 14, 2026, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/26 12:09 AM, Igor Korot wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, ALL,
>>> Have one weird question ;-)
>>>
>>> When I connect with ODBC and call SQLPrimaryKey() the function returns
>>>
>>
>> Are you actually using the SQLPrimaryKeys(), not SQLPrimaryKey()?
>>
>> all fields including
>>> "included" fields.
>>>
>>
>> Define 'included' fields.
>>
>
> They are referring to the unique index that backs the PK constraint.
>
Not “they” - “He”. 😊
And yes - that’s what I’m referring to.
Thank you.
> David J.
>
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Cc: ikorot01@gmail.com, david.g.johnston@gmail.com, pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Does included columns part of the PK
In-Reply-To: <CA+FnnTyFVn4Ebx9kP-5vooZwpATwV5Euc8Nt6TGmEuR6oDYd9A@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox