public inbox for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jeroen Vermeulen <jtvjtv@gmail.com>
Cc: VASUKI M <vasukianand0119@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:50:50 +0300
Message-ID: <6a8122ac-123d-4e93-9269-0b3be1e4a5a4@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+hUKGKy-ViGBXdOjcPownBM=OdWiULO8H1RyH1r_8qNp=U4CA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <19354-eefe6d8b3e84f9f2@postgresql.org>
	<CA+TgmoaRGSezRaA7x00X495Qho8WGTzggbDSUt-JsruXceZWug@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+zULE4L4rA2DLAcfy=eQL7w_ZexV4P5zpQRbP=_qrhJBEOzjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<2292889.1765846569@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CAE2r8H5vaSyaC_t1FcpHBo-BB_=SrFj7GFnOC-SxC6WDf5c9VA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+zULE47EXZOp7qKYODd+mjSgDiR-WX5ZNBkwdKnj-Zc0FT58w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+TgmoZaoc37ohnhF5inoPxWzfoznV483xQw8Fmw+ELFScv47g@mail.gmail.com>
	<2393116.1765899706@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+TgmoaoW4F2rRzYcQQim9ddT4-6H3oi0UYV9Ucw-rRQ5MdHsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+hUKGKy-ViGBXdOjcPownBM=OdWiULO8H1RyH1r_8qNp=U4CA@mail.gmail.com>

On 14/04/2026 09:30, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 7:43 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think there is a good chance that the right going-forward fix is to
>> deprecate the encoding, because according to
>> https://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/EASTASIA/ReadMe.txt this and
>> everything else that's now under
>> https://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/OBSOLETE/EASTASIA/ were
>> deprecated in 2001. By the time v19 is released, the deprecation will
>> be a quarter-century old, and the fact that it doesn't work is good
>> evidence that few people will miss it, though perhaps the original
>> poster will want to put forward an argument for why we should still
>> care about this.
> 
> Right, that stuff was withdrawn, along with the BIG5 and JIS X 0212
> mappings (here's some interesting discussion about their normative
> status[1]).  From what I can figure out, JOHAB was an MS-DOS codepage
> (1361), obsoleted by UHC (949) some time around MS-DOS 6.22 or MS-DOS
> 7 and Windows 95.
> 
> So +1 from me, set the phasers to git rm.

+1

> Based on the comments for enum pg_enc, we don't need to worry about
> numerical stability of client-only encodings, so I just deleted it
> (unlike PG_MULE_INTERNAL which became PG_UNUSED_1).
Ok. I hope there are no 8.2-era client programs out there that are still 
abusing pg_wchar.h. I think we're good, but we've never really exercised 
the strategy that was laid out in commit 8468146b03c8.

> Wait until 20, or just do it now?
Let's just do it now.
- Heikki

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: hlinnaka@iki.fi, thomas.munro@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jtvjtv@gmail.com, vasukianand0119@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
  In-Reply-To: <6a8122ac-123d-4e93-9269-0b3be1e4a5a4@iki.fi>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox