public inbox for pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Cc: Umair Shahid <umair.shahid@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>
Cc: Cornelia Biacsics <cornelia.biacsics@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 09:12:39 -0800
Message-ID: <b2d33610-44d7-4b0f-ba38-a478a51092e9@aklaver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <o4aakzyxzthvjm4kkkgr3t7xwo2xeu3ipg5fnmlil345wevibr@7jfkjhtsoeae>
References: <CAN_SPgpnvhZzUjXJ_u4h7bYT_9=N8RO1AytA7_T--4pScpeU_g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKAnmmJPD11WpS-RCbsddhgDrZ2-_61SMjo1vaFtJuUogwTJEw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAM184Afu+rcc-eVfc4nTMNDcyjAQcopFd4hygU+UZtW70d6xtQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+OCxowxEj2=6PvofPHy_azBsv3p_k8jkB_jaFnRq2Tw6iQv2g@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmoYC0AesZbVEa+5HKv5LrUaMXwzJVJq=PCEs8vqESN+=hQ@mail.gmail.com>
<o4aakzyxzthvjm4kkkgr3t7xwo2xeu3ipg5fnmlil345wevibr@7jfkjhtsoeae>
On 12/9/25 08:42, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-12-08 09:20:18 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 8:24 AM Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>> Agreed - and companies like pgEdge and EDB have policies and often employment contracts that specifically encourage contributions.
>>
>> I'm kind of surprised by the direction of this conversation, because
>> I'm aware of some problematic cases.
>
> Seconded. I'm also aware of quite a few cases. I'm rather surprised to hear so
> many others not having seen problems - IME it's a rather substantial portion
> of job changes that run into problems around non-competes.
>
> Sure, in most cases the non-competes are not in the end not going to be
> legally enforceable. But it's going to cost a lot of lawyer time to go to that
> point, and most are going to do their best to stay far away from the legal
> system.
It seems to me since this is a legal issue it merits a legal response.
My thought is the fund suggested in the original post go to sponsoring
legal representation from one of the FOSS law firms in aid of
challenging the non-competes. Making companies cough up money to defend
what are probably non-legal actions would get their attention. Once it
becomes plain there is a cost associated with the clauses I suspect
their use would diminish. Yes, I realize we are getting into the realm
of international law and it could get complicated.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Cc: adrian.klaver@aklaver.com, andres@anarazel.de, robertmhaas@gmail.com, dpage@pgadmin.org, umair.shahid@gmail.com, htamfids@gmail.com, cornelia.biacsics@gmail.com, pgsql-advocacy@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work
In-Reply-To: <b2d33610-44d7-4b0f-ba38-a478a51092e9@aklaver.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox