Return-Path: owner-postman Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.4/8.6.3) with SMTP id PAA23883 for postgres-dist; Tue, 15 Feb 1994 15:06:08 -0800 Resent-From: POSTGRES mailing list Resent-Message-Id: <199402152306.PAA23883@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU> X-Authentication-Warning: nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol Sender: owner-postman@postgres.Berkeley.EDU X-Return-Path: owner-postman Received: from inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com (inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com [16.1.0.22]) by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.4/8.6.3) with SMTP id PAA23872 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 1994 15:06:00 -0800 Received: from slugbt.zso.dec.com by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com (5.65/13Jan94) id AA20416; Tue, 15 Feb 94 11:53:55 -0800 Received: by slugbt.zso.dec.com; (5.65/DECwest-OSF-Nov-12-93) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 1994 11:53:52 -0800 From: Bruce Lowe Message-Id: <9402151953.AA29417@slugbt.zso.dec.com> To: postgres@postgres.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Request for info update Resent-To: postgres-dist@postgres.Berkeley.EDU Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 15:06:08 -0800 Resent-XMts: smtp About a year ago, I tried Postgres (Ultrix) and liked it, but I had certain reservations and questions. I posted the following note and received a reply, the text is included below. Have there been any more recent developments regarding my questions in particular, and regarding Postgres in general? -Bruce Lowe ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: lowe To: postgres@postgres.berkeley.edu Cc: lowe@rust Subject: some questions from a new user Date: Fri, 15 Jan 93 10:42:40 -0800 From: lowe X-Mts: smtp I am a software developer with DEC, with experience in commercial Ingres application development (I grew up on version 5 using QUEL). I have recently downloaded and installed Postgres and have been doing a little experimenting with it. I have a few questions for anyone who might know and answer: - The biggest obstacle I have found for getting good use from Postgres is the apparent lack of a facility for retrieving status/error information. There is a reference in the file "c.h" about future plans for a global variable to contain the status of the last operation (retrieving from the ERROR relation is mentioned, but I can find no such relation). My question is this: is there a way that the status/error state for the last operation can be manually retrieved from some system relation (ala INQUIRE_INGRES)? Could error text info by subsequently looked up? - Has anyone written an embedded quel preprocessor ? - Has anyone done any porting work to OSF ? Specifically OSF running on a DEC Alpha box ? Would there be any significant difficulties due to 32/64 bit issues ? - How about NT ? I gather that the port to NT would by of much greater difficulty since the sockets and shared memory mechanisms are so different. I will look forward to any replies. THank you. -Bruce Lowe ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA17140; Fri, 15 Jan 93 13:19:30 -0800 Received: by faerie.CS.Berkeley.EDU (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA13016; Fri, 15 Jan 93 13:19:48 -0800 From: Message-Id: <9301152119.AA13016@faerie.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: lowe@rust.zso.dec.com Cc: postgres@postgres.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: some questions from a new user In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 15 Jan 93 10:42:40 -0800 <9301151840.AA07965@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 93 13:19:48 PST I don't have a good answer for the error-handling question. There aren't any current plans that I know of to change it. > - Has anyone written an embedded quel preprocessor ? libpq is the only application interface that I know of. > - Has anyone done any porting work to OSF ? Specifically OSF running on a DEC > Alpha box ? Would there be any significant difficulties due to 32/64 bit > issues ? We are working on an Alpha port. Yes, there are difficulties with 32/64-bit issues (though they appear to be of a "massive pain-in-the-rear" nature rather than really "significant"). In fact, if you have any pull with the DEC compiler guys, perhaps you could suggest that they provide a command-line switch that makes "int" 8 bytes for the OSF/1 C compiler.. > - How about NT ? I gather that the port to NT would by of much > greater difficulty since the sockets and shared memory mechanisms are so > different. A Berkeley-written NT port is still very much in the discussion/politics phase. Disclaimer: I'm just a post_hacker. I don't speak for Mike Stonebraker. -- Paul M. Aoki | CS Div., Dept. of EECS, UCB | aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU | Berkeley, CA 94720 | ...!uunet!ucbvax!aoki