Return-Path: postarch
Received: by postgres.Berkeley.EDU (5.61/1.29)
	id AA13161; Mon, 30 Mar 92 11:28:26 -0800
Message-Id: <9203301928.AA13161@postgres.Berkeley.EDU>
From: postarch (Postgres Mailing Archive)
Subject: Re: SQL
To: postgres@postgres.berkeley.edu
Sender: pg_adm@postgres.berkeley.edu
Reply-To: mer@postgres.berkeley.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 Mar 92 09:01:00 PST."
             <9203201701.AA19528@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 92 11:27:56 PST

you write:
> Could anyone explain why postgres does not supply SQL facility?

As joseash put it (in my words) there isn't a lot of research interest
there, and to support the complete SQL spec would be a real pain in the b*tt
(correlated sub-queries give me nightmares).


Jeff Meredith
mer@postgres.berkeley.edu