Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1w2vAr-000jPS-1K for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:59:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1w2vAq-00D9ea-03 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:59:16 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1w2vAp-00D9eJ-2V for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:59:15 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1w2vAe-00000000yYF-03Ci for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:59:10 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 62IHwtQP806558; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:58:55 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Nathan Bossart cc: Robert Haas , Peter Eisentraut , "David G. Johnston" , "Ing. Marijo Kristo" , PostgreSQL Bug List Subject: Re: Revoke Connect Privilege from Database not working In-reply-to: References: <3467676.1744041977@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1933586.1768950341@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2222571.1769014621@sss.pgh.pa.us> <770633.1773851777@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Nathan Bossart message dated "Wed, 18 Mar 2026 12:47:17 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <806556.1773856735.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:58:55 -0400 Message-ID: <806557.1773856735@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Nathan Bossart writes: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 12:36:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> the word "possess" seems a little ambiguous --- it's not clear whether >> it means SET or INHERIT privileges. The grammar nerd in me doesn't >> like "they" either. How about s/they possess/it inherits/ ? >> (likewise in revoke.sgml) > This crossed my mind when copy/pasting from the "GRANT on Roles" section, > but I obviously didn't do anything about it. Fixed in the attached. v4 LGTM. regards, tom lane