Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h1mtX-0007Br-JA for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 06:52:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h1mtU-0007l9-K3 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 06:52:40 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h1mtU-0007l2-9P for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 06:52:40 +0000 Received: from mail.thelabyrinth.net ([45.56.70.56]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h1mtR-0001mq-0z for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 06:52:38 +0000 Received: from Davids-MacBook.local (unknown [172.56.31.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dsteele) by mail.thelabyrinth.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 149165461E; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 06:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables To: Pavel Stehule , Artur Zakirov Cc: Dean Rasheed , Fabien COELHO , Gilles Darold , PostgreSQL Hackers , Peter Eisentraut References: <20180919112305.GA18604@zakirov.localdomain> From: David Steele Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 08:52:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 3/3/19 10:27 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > rebase and fix compilation due changes related pg_dump This patch hasn't receive any review in a while and I'm not sure if that's because nobody is interested or the reviewers think it does not need any more review. It seems to me that this patch as implemented does not quite satisfy any one. I think we need to hear something from the reviewers soon or I'll push this patch to PG13 as Andres recommends [1]. -- -David david@pgmasters.net [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190216054526.zss2cufdxfeudr4i%40alap3.anarazel.de