Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fcXwt-0003DS-1v for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 15:19:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fcXwr-0002BL-9E for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 15:19:33 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fcXwq-0002BE-VL for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 15:19:33 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fcXwo-0000Jg-8X for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 15:19:31 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fcXwm-00047M-8I; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 11:19:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 11:19:28 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Amit Kapila Cc: Justin Pryzby , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: add default parallel query to v10 release notes? (Re: [PERFORM] performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10)) Message-ID: <20180709151928.GB19710@momjian.us> References: <20171026194515.GV21735@telsasoft.com> <20180128235310.GA5024@momjian.us> <20180525010025.GT30060@telsasoft.com> <20180620151349.GB7500@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 02:53:36PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:00:25PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > So I did some research on this, particularly to find out how it was > > missed in the PG 10 release notes. It turns out that > > max_parallel_workers_per_gather has always defaulted to 2 in head, and > > this was changed to default to 0 in the 9.6 branch: > > > > commit f85b1a84152f7bf019fd7a2c5eede97867dcddbb > > Author: Robert Haas > > Date: Tue Aug 16 08:09:15 2016 -0400 > > > > Disable parallel query by default. > > > > Per discussion, set the default value of max_parallel_workers_per_gather > > to 0 in 9.6 only. We'll leave it enabled in master so that it gets > > more testing and in the hope that it can be enable by default in v10. > > > > Therefore, there was no commit to find in the PG 10 commit logs. :-O > > Not sure how we can avoid this kind of problem in the future. > > > > The attached patch adds a PG 10.0 release note item about this change. > > > > Your proposed text looks good to me. Done, thanks. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +