public inbox for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: johannes graën <johannes@selfnet.de>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10)
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:45:15 -0500
Message-ID: <20171026194515.GV21735@telsasoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA++JNSfTEifSiBq73zpGCQuDNGr9yYcjmkx_=LtAbnadKLY_vg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA++JNSeCW1BSRVS7N--OmVOMDiMVA61_DFMA24fFbM2R7JdQjQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRDnW+bD5OmWjawxryv_=BctsE8HF5Y1n=oxgQ+xwrVqUQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA++JNScUoxYKBhURxbG_DzoUfgKJup4a4TXUTiG1FFjuq8X-VQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA++JNSfTEifSiBq73zpGCQuDNGr9yYcjmkx_=LtAbnadKLY_vg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 04:15:59PM +0200, johannes graën wrote:
> Hi Pavel, *,
>
> you were right with ANALYZing the DB first. However, even after doing
> so, I frequently see Seq Scans where an index was used before. This
> usually cooccurs with parallelization and looked different before
> upgrading to 10. I can provide an example for 10 [1], but I cannot
> generate a query plan for 9.6 anymore.
>
> Any ideas what makes the new version more seqscanny?
Is it because max_parallel_workers_per_gather now defaults to 2 ?
BTW, I would tentatively expect a change in default to be documented in the
release notes but can't see that it's.
77cd477c4ba885cfa1ba67beaa82e06f2e182b85
Justin
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pryzby@telsasoft.com, johannes@selfnet.de, pavel.stehule@gmail.com
Subject: Re: performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10)
In-Reply-To: <20171026194515.GV21735@telsasoft.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox