public inbox for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 21:56:45 -0400
Message-ID: <1f204fb8-afe6-006d-853b-4da05b416840@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFj8pRCptLktoDiCYK_rL2OgOGR-+B1QrNUGcK+Mkqi+KhWj+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFj8pRDY+m9OOxfO10R7J0PAkCCauM-TweaTrdsrsLGMb1VbEQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20180417141410.GA7917@zakirov.localdomain>
<CAFj8pRD3RGW7zoHs2-4FgUKnV7TmHYbZiQYq1KS+KgwS3W30bQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+Tgmoaf44_UONp7zHgmkRwFNPbr7-7XnuZYu_JqSdZMrLi3cA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRCptLktoDiCYK_rL2OgOGR-+B1QrNUGcK+Mkqi+KhWj+g@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/20/18 13:45, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I dunno, it seems awfully different to me. There's only one "column",
> right? What code is really shared here? Are constraints and triggers
> even desirable feature for variables? What would be the use case?
>
>
> The schema variable can hold composite value. The patch allows to use
> any composite type or adhoc composite values
>
> DECLARE x AS compositetype;
> DECLARE x AS (a int, b int, c int);
I'm not sure that this anonymous composite type thing is such a good
idea. Such a variable will then be incompatible with anything else,
because it's of a different type.
In any case, I find that a weak argument for storing this in pg_class.
You could just as well create these pg_class entries implicitly and link
them from "pg_variable", same as composite types have a main entry in
pg_type and additional stuff in pg_class.
> I think stuffing this into pg_class is pretty strange.
>
> It will be if variable is just scalar value without any possibilities.
> But then there is only low benefit
>
> The access rights implementation is shared with other from pg_class too.
In DB2, the privileges for variables are named READ and WRITE. That
would make more sense to me than reusing the privilege names for tables.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, pavel.stehule@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables
In-Reply-To: <1f204fb8-afe6-006d-853b-4da05b416840@2ndquadrant.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox