MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CA+FnnTz7+dbyk5Gn2iM-eo1Xvfax15yjBevmCCfvo0-UVW1K7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <b3f6ecfb-8772-4e15-a772-8e64fb573d49@aklaver.com>
 <CAKFQuwYswndGOm6vnsoNSTWHEC5d29bvYokymtDEY_cyW54FEQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+FnnTyFVn4Ebx9kP-5vooZwpATwV5Euc8Nt6TGmEuR6oDYd9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <3547f40b-08b9-4d0c-bba8-f1c26d0bf09d@aklaver.com>
 <CA+FnnTwLvp1wweqWJkw1+sg4x+pM_oGVmfc-3TaPpE_557=A_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <2c31c118-7f8a-4359-9c4f-4cabd9df4262@aklaver.com>
 <CA+FnnTx5WZeYwg-OFwvbipvHRJP263UP8EVNY0aGMu6E_XuKsQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <7461c77a-4536-4f53-b951-99b9ca33db79@aklaver.com>
 <CA+FnnTw+HhguiTO27hzTUTU6uRBY_wRRwB=xT+7=t_0CdrCsoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <105a9d1a-c219-401a-9b81-4d77dde901f5@aklaver.com>
 <da939085-813e-4505-880d-aafa91c8509d@aklaver.com>
 <CA+FnnTxh0ZvsaKvkpg7OLQBVhhicsv2u+uk9d0jf+qmF5q=YTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <f61e570d-73a2-49b2-a612-09d94e9f794e@aklaver.com>
 <CA+FnnTzXK876siRuPhqav59SmzTSZUYmo9vGqffRn8g0Vr9f8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <e612ab0e-37c9-4dc2-8cec-9c5fe9baf284@aklaver.com>
 <CA+FnnTyH7Hp2tO03UnLE_cpZ_rerdttV02_gVBxM5jiz3Z2GSg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+FnnTyH7Hp2tO03UnLE_cpZ_rerdttV02_gVBxM5jiz3Z2GSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 22:33:33 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CA+FnnTzXgAU8k2LxPeiOZpfKjOyM-vutsaRV-sFHv431-64gSA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Does included columns part of the PK
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BFnnTzXgAU8k2LxPeiOZpfKjOyM-vutsaRV-sFHv431-64gSA%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

For all involved and interested:

The issue with ODBC driver has been fixed and will
be part of the next release.

Ref: https://github.com/postgresql-interfaces/psqlodbc/issues/170.

Thank you.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 6:11=E2=80=AFPM Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com> wro=
te:
>
> Adrian,,
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 5:44=E2=80=AFPM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@akla=
ver.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/16/26 4:38 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
> > > Adrian,
> > >
> > > Most important - do you agree that those fields should not be in this
> > > recordset?
> >
> > I don't see anything here:
> >
> > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/odbc/reference/syntax/sqlprimaryk=
eys-function?view=3Dsql-server-ver17
> >
> > that says they should be returned. Though the above also says:
> >
> > " Additional columns beyond column 6 (PK_NAME) can be defined by the
> > driver."
> >
> > That is not the case here, where additional rows are used. However it
> > does allow for more information to be supplied.
> >
> > My purely un-expert analysis is, no the extra rows should not be there.
>
> Thx for confirming.
>
> I already forwarded the email with the query results over to ODBC list.
>
> Hopefully someone can come back soon.
>
> Are you reading that list as well? If not I will update this thread
> with the results.
>
> Thank you.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> >
> > --
> > Adrian Klaver
> > adrian.klaver@aklaver.com