Feedback-ID: ie3de48e3:Fastmail
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 13:32:45 -0700
From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>,
	JoongHyuk Shin <sjh910805@gmail.com>,
	"pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
 Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent repeated deadlock-check signals in standby
 buffer pin waits
Message-ID: <agt3Aez4a51JC5Ji@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <aecRYWJmfQnuVDBe@paquier.xyz>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/agt3Aez4a51JC5Ji%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

On 2026-Apr-21, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 02:42:38PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > Since this change improves recovery-conflict behavior rather than fixing a bug,
> > it doesn't seem to need backpatching and we may need to wait until v20
> > development opens (probably July) before committing it.
> 
> Yeah, this one is an improvement, not an actual bug, so let's wait for
> v20 if worth doing (I did not check it). 

Hmm, is this related to 
https://postgr.es/m/44c24dcf-5710-410f-b1b6-d10b315f3d51@postgrespro.ru ?
In there, Vitaly claims to be reporting a bug that goes back to pg15,
which contradicts this assessment.

Regards,

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"¿Qué importan los años?  Lo que realmente importa es comprobar que
a fin de cuentas la mejor edad de la vida es estar vivo"  (Mafalda)