Message-ID: <6634e1b0b5b74e5c2e3b06201120a81e11d82a55.camel@cybertec.at>
Subject: Re: Report oldest xmin source when autovacuum cannot remove tuples
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Cc: wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>,
 PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 06:35:37 -0700
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOzEurRAiBfN-f5juywYzjS+5rWXTSSr3jaVaCJ39TJnwvUimQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
	<CAOzEurSgy-gDtwFmEbj5+R9PL0_G3qYB6nnzJtNStyuf87VSVg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAHGQGwFVdccfhN7PFHU5gZcMNdQuyL8DhZSks2FuuTcZ5V_pGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAGjGUAL-qZ6Na-cH4RY5raF4NwuF47ZVNyP0uMYQcks3w5b7Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAA5RZ0s+UUXekbeGcC-H71kW=MfeaUCOV=yEWX94NXViO2-=pA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAOzEurQVUsRa45aKdi1Qrc4wVsQKSmbLcN+2A9Eu1W1jm2Y5fw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAA5RZ0sjMgMo4Xg-niyyF-CpkQ_CK6uOfNKYT=9RmiBkAxQkbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAGjGUAJ8JVL9J32ChchmVLgZycEyXf-r-KHc5EiRM3LDiEoPtA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAOzEurTNVkvvscKeEOy0WwfzyqO+J_MyXwkjRteJ_zyydteKCQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAGjGUAK6j4K3OMocdtPZRwTyF_U7Y47-bzxUDu4ZeUdg35Vtnw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <SY7PR01MB109210F944A86A8771BC5EE2AB640A@SY7PR01MB10921.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
	 <CAOzEurSa37w_wgP7SeVicsoo5ERXc4V7XQH2xee5YM-W9uRRBA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <SY7PR01MB10921CD524617DCF4FE8E2565B60C2@SY7PR01MB10921.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
	 <CAOzEurS5s9cbXP7XT0EHe9KynLqsjJt56mqL+ZAPKD0jvrYPBw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAOzEurRAiBfN-f5juywYzjS+5rWXTSSr3jaVaCJ39TJnwvUimQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-1.fc43) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6634e1b0b5b74e5c2e3b06201120a81e11d82a55.camel%40cybertec.at>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 2026-05-23 at 15:00 +0900, Shinya Kato wrote:
> Oops, I made a slight mistake. Fixed.

I think that is a great feature that will improve users' lives!

The patch looks fine to me too.
I guess the overhead of one more scan of the process array for every autova=
cuum
run if "log_autovacuum_min_duration" is non-zero (which is the default)
is acceptable.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe