Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.2\))
Subject: Re: Index / glossary adjustments for Git & GUC
From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABV9wwPQnkeo_G6-orMGnHPK9SXGVWm7ajJPzsbE6944tDx=hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 10:03:43 +0200
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <FFBAE5D1-F0E6-4983-80B3-82FF0B1CF6F5@yesql.se>
References: 
 <CABV9wwPQnkeo_G6-orMGnHPK9SXGVWm7ajJPzsbE6944tDx=hQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/FFBAE5D1-F0E6-4983-80B3-82FF0B1CF6F5%40yesql.se>
Precedence: bulk

> On 13 Aug 2025, at 01:16, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> wrote:

> The first patch removes the term "Git" from the acronyms section and
> instead creates an index entry that points to our source repository
> information.

This was previously discussed in this thread:

https://postgr.es/m/8241CED6-F408-4660-A1AA-F3393AA26219%40yesql.se

> For the second, ISTM we use the term GUC to refer to parameters pretty
> liberally, but the term is not that easy to find in the docs (and
> website search gives what is probably the best answer as result #7 of
> 8). This creates an index entry for the term, as well as a glossary
> entry which explains how it is commonly used.

This seems like a good idea.

--
Daniel Gustafsson