Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vcBZb-002qJ3-1i for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2026 00:02:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vcBZa-00EHly-1B for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2026 00:02:19 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vcBZa-00EHlp-0S for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2026 00:02:18 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vcBZZ-0043Gd-1X for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2026 00:02:18 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 60402DIg759405; Sat, 3 Jan 2026 19:02:13 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andreas Karlsson cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, Babak Ghadiri Subject: Re: Parallelizing startup with many databases In-reply-to: References: <0def7076-40b4-485a-83e7-d0dd1e31a472@proxel.se> Comments: In-reply-to Andreas Karlsson message dated "Sun, 04 Jan 2026 00:55:05 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <759403.1767484933.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2026 19:02:13 -0500 Message-ID: <759404.1767484933@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andreas Karlsson writes: > On 1/4/26 12:26 AM, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote: >> > If we move the GUC in the documentation shouldn't we also move it in > postgresql.conf.sample? The sections in the documentation and the > sections in the sample config file seem to be the same. You would also need to change the group that the GUC is assigned to in guc_parameters.dat. So this isn't really a docs-only patch. (I agree that the GUC seems misclassified as-is.) regards, tom lane