MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <19354-eefe6d8b3e84f9f2@postgresql.org>
 <CA+TgmoaRGSezRaA7x00X495Qho8WGTzggbDSUt-JsruXceZWug@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+zULE4L4rA2DLAcfy=eQL7w_ZexV4P5zpQRbP=_qrhJBEOzjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <2292889.1765846569@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAE2r8H5vaSyaC_t1FcpHBo-BB_=SrFj7GFnOC-SxC6WDf5c9VA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+zULE47EXZOp7qKYODd+mjSgDiR-WX5ZNBkwdKnj-Zc0FT58w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoZaoc37ohnhF5inoPxWzfoznV483xQw8Fmw+ELFScv47g@mail.gmail.com>
 <2393116.1765899706@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoaoW4F2rRzYcQQim9ddT4-6H3oi0UYV9Ucw-rRQ5MdHsg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGKy-ViGBXdOjcPownBM=OdWiULO8H1RyH1r_8qNp=U4CA@mail.gmail.com>
 <6a8122ac-123d-4e93-9269-0b3be1e4a5a4@iki.fi>
 <CAAAe_zCLVunjt1u+2E86shwc3hk1x4bzUyU86nY1fq-nAVYN0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGJMrcS=hBkqVk=5pjM4w8edG=_ArASC82RqB6HQro-v-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAAe_zCwaccH7h+GOtHbo_docCY-o0c5NMRuYkdz15f=KL4f0g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAAe_zAFz1v-3b7Je4L+=wZM3UGAczXV47YVZfZi9wbJxspxeA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGJunp3ZszLxaHndkMoGiT_0SW+3FSiS=v=79FHsR6Rr+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoYnU1me+nU6Mj+jE+SP87xY2AomkdgZptdqqKLh=Cq3GQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+TgmoYnU1me+nU6Mj+jE+SP87xY2AomkdgZptdqqKLh=Cq3GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: assam258@gmail.com
From: Henson Choi <assam258@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 18:39:13 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CAAAe_zDuTVCQuLnZv827yR2uAx+fgSixeWa+gvEgtSgQe_M28A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
 Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jeroen Vermeulen <jtvjtv@gmail.com>,
	VASUKI M <vasukianand0119@gmail.com>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000781420651ec1bd2"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAAe_zDuTVCQuLnZv827yR2uAx%2BfgSixeWa%2BgvEgtSgQe_M28A%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

--0000000000000781420651ec1bd2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2026=EB=85=84 5=EC=9B=94 15=EC=9D=BC (=EA=B8=88) =EC=98=A4=EC=A0=84 4:36, R=
obert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>=EB=8B=98=EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1:

> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 2:59=E2=80=AFAM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.=
com>
> wrote:>
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 5:58=E2=80=AFPM Henson Choi <assam258@gmail.com=
> wrote:
> > > While reading through the encoding alias table in
> src/common/encnames.c,
> > > I noticed a few long-standing inaccuracies and omissions in the
> per-entry
> > > comments for the three Korean encodings.
> >
> > LGTM, so I will go ahead and push this to all branches.
>
> I see that this was done, but this isn't the actual fix for this
> issue, right? Is somebody going to apply the main fix patch (perhaps
> just to master)?


Right -- the cosmetic encnames.c comment cleanup is what Thomas
pushed; the actual verifier fix is still pending.  Tatsuo gave a +1
for preserving JOHAB and applying the verifier correction.

Thomas may have other priorities right now.  This is not urgent on my
end, so I am content to wait for him.

Thanks,
Henson

--0000000000000781420651ec1bd2
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">2026=EB=85=84 5=EC=9B=94 15=EC=9D=BC (=EA=
=B8=88) =EC=98=A4=EC=A0=84 4:36, Robert Haas &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:robertmh=
aas@gmail.com">robertmhaas@gmail.com</a>&gt;=EB=8B=98=EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=
=84=B1:<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><blockquo=
te class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px =
solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 2:59=E2=80=
=AFAM Thomas Munro &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:thomas.munro@gmail.com" target=3D"=
_blank">thomas.munro@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:&gt;<br>
&gt; On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 5:58=E2=80=AFPM Henson Choi &lt;<a href=3D"mai=
lto:assam258@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">assam258@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:=
<br>
&gt; &gt; While reading through the encoding alias table in src/common/encn=
ames.c,<br>
&gt; &gt; I noticed a few long-standing inaccuracies and omissions in the p=
er-entry<br>
&gt; &gt; comments for the three Korean encodings.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; LGTM, so I will go ahead and push this to all branches.<br>
<br>
I see that this was done, but this isn&#39;t the actual fix for this<br>
issue, right? Is somebody going to apply the main fix patch (perhaps<br>
just to master)?</blockquote><div><br></div>Right -- the cosmetic encnames.=
c comment cleanup is what Thomas<br>pushed; the actual verifier fix is stil=
l pending.=C2=A0 Tatsuo gave a +1<br>for preserving JOHAB and applying the =
verifier correction.<br><br>Thomas may have other priorities right now.=C2=
=A0 This is not urgent on my<br>end, so I am content to wait for him.<br><b=
r>Thanks,<br><div>Henson=C2=A0</div></div></div>

--0000000000000781420651ec1bd2--