public inbox for pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Umair Shahid <umair.shahid@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>
Cc: Cornelia Biacsics <cornelia.biacsics@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 14:17:10 -0500
Message-ID: <aVV2tqTab7FCFu2U@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+OCxozFtSC24tcAumXi8+tG6+xt1SMrXLcBbK==+p+WrNaKqA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN_SPgpnvhZzUjXJ_u4h7bYT_9=N8RO1AytA7_T--4pScpeU_g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKAnmmJPD11WpS-RCbsddhgDrZ2-_61SMjo1vaFtJuUogwTJEw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAM184Afu+rcc-eVfc4nTMNDcyjAQcopFd4hygU+UZtW70d6xtQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+OCxowxEj2=6PvofPHy_azBsv3p_k8jkB_jaFnRq2Tw6iQv2g@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmoYC0AesZbVEa+5HKv5LrUaMXwzJVJq=PCEs8vqESN+=hQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+OCxozvGs4dA5hcKkffedBwUVET47OZLiXoztk8ON7e8ap8Jg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+Tgmoa7skap0a42zn=YU3NqGwcGzp-r6G--PdTJNjj-JTtckw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+OCxozFtSC24tcAumXi8+tG6+xt1SMrXLcBbK==+p+WrNaKqA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 04:59:33PM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 16:57, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> > I don't think she's wrong - I just think the issue is much smaller than
> suggested and that there are likely better places to spend time, effort,
> and money at the moment (such as, I believe, the average age of our
> contributors being on the rise). More and more jurisdictions seem to be
> banning non-competes (or regularly ruling against them) for employees, so
> it seems to me that the problem is slowly going away anyway.
>
> It's all a bit related, though. Older, more established contributors
> are more likely to have leverage that they can use to preserve their
> employment options, or the resources to get through a period of
> unemployment or under-employment. Younger or less well-established
> contributors are more likely to get pushed out of the community by an
> adverse event (such as an employer or ex-employer with a good lawyer).
>
> True, that could definitely be a factor.
I thought about this for a while. I think there are several factors:
* Many people have companies based in jurisdictions that don't enforce
non-competes.
* Many people have not read their employment contracts and will not
find out about non-compete restrictions until they leave their
employer.
* Because broad non-compete restrictions are often unenforceable, newer
non-compete restrictions are more limited, which makes them less of a
problem.
I don't know if things are improving and we can ignore the issue, or if
there is some action that can be taken. Ideas are:
* New employees should read employment contracts and ideally have them
reviewed by an employment lawyer. It might be difficult, but not
being able to find a suitable job for a year is clearly worse.
* Somehow incentivize companies to limit their non-compete restrictions
to be more limited, and hopefully not block community involvement.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Cc: bruce@momjian.us, dpage@pgadmin.org, robertmhaas@gmail.com, umair.shahid@gmail.com, htamfids@gmail.com, cornelia.biacsics@gmail.com, pgsql-advocacy@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work
In-Reply-To: <aVV2tqTab7FCFu2U@momjian.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox