Return-Path: phansen@together.net
Received: from mailer.together.net (root@mailer.together.net [204.97.120.27]) by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with ESMTP id HAA02676; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 07:46:59 -0800
Received: from sequoia.together.net (sequoia.together.net [204.97.120.25]) by mailer.together.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA13107; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 10:47:10 -0500
Received: (from phansen@localhost) by sequoia.together.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA24606; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 10:50:28 -0500
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 10:50:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Paul Hansen <phansen@together.net>
X-Sender: phansen@sequoia
To: owner-postgres95@postgres.Berkeley.EDU, pglite@postgres.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: smartlist malfunctioning. 
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951113104050.24777G-100000@sequoia>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-To: owner-postgres95
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 07:47:02 -0800
Resent-From: pglite
Resent-XMts: smtp

I have now received up to 3 copies of messages, resent many hours apart,
from the postgres95 mailing list. Smartlist must not be happy...and the
volume of e-mail is getting a little rediculous. No one has posted to the
list complaining, thankfully. 

A sample is attached (this was the third copy I received.)

Paul

--
Paul Hansen                 TGF Technologies / Internet Services Development
webmaster@together.net         130 S. Willard St. / Burlington, VT 05401 USA
http://together.net/~phansen/      Tel: (802) 862-2030 / Fax: (802) 862-1890

----------
>From blape@utk.eduMon Nov 13 10:44:27 1995
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.58]) by sequoia.together.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA24141; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 10:36:05 -0500
Received: from cerebus.compulink.co.uk (root@cerebus.compulink.co.uk [194.72.180.153]) by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id BAA02291 for <postgres95-redist@nobozo.cs.berkeley.edu>; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 01:30:03 -0800
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.58]) by lead.compulink.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA04621 for <chaz@cerebus.compulink.co.uk>; Sat, 11 Nov 1995 10:11:50 GMT
Received: from cerebus.compulink.co.uk (root@cerebus.compulink.co.uk [194.72.180.153]) by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id AAA16824 for <postgres95-redist@nobozo.cs.berkeley.edu>; Sat, 11 Nov 1995 00:13:03 -0800
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.58]) by lead.compulink.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA06090 for <chaz@cerebus.compulink.co.uk>; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 18:58:08 GMT
Received: from localhost.Berkeley.EDU (localhost.Berkeley.EDU [127.0.0.1]) by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id HAA22168 for postgres95-redist; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 07:04:52 -0800
Resent-From: Postgres95 Team <pglite@postgres.Berkeley.EDU>
Resent-Message-Id: <199511071504.HAA22168@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Authentication-Warning: nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU: Host localhost.Berkeley.EDU didn't use HELO protocol
Sender: owner-postgres95@postgres.Berkeley.EDU
X-Return-Path: andrew_yu
Received: from aztec.lib.utk.edu (AZTEC.LIB.UTK.EDU [128.169.206.31]) by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id HAA16044 for <postgres95@nobozo.cs.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 07:04:51 -0800
Received: from LIBPC87.LIB.UTK.EDU by aztec.lib.utk.edu (5.x/2.8s-UTK)
	id AA00043; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 10:03:36 -0500
Message-Id: <9511071503.AA00043@aztec.lib.utk.edu>
X-Sender: bryon@128.169.206.31
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 1995 10:04:41 -0500
To: rp2y+@cs.cmu.edu, jarnott@bridge.com, postgres95@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU
From: blape@utk.edu (Bryon S. Lape)
Subject: Re: (fwd) 
Resent-To: postgres95-redist@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 95 07:04:52 -0800
Resent-XMts: smtp

>
>The "real" way to do this is use the '~' operator and a full-blown regular 
>expression (I had discussed this previously with someone, I thought it was 
>Bryon Lape).

        Yes it was me.

        My next question then is what is faster for full-word searching?
The three OR's (Things are not case sensitive) or the regular expression?
Or should I not be concerned with speed at this point?


bryon
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
No matter the law, the will is still free.

Bryon S. Lape
e-mail: blape@utk.edu  WWW:http://aztec.lib.utk.edu/~bryon/


===============================================================================
  To unsubscribe from the Postgres95 mailing list, send mail with the subject
  line "DEL" to "postgres95-request@postgres.Berkeley.EDU". 
============  URL: http://s2k-ftp.CS.Berkeley.EDU:8000/postgres95/  ===========




