Return-Path: postman 
Delivery-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 93 17:01:35 PDT
Return-Path: postman
Received: by postgres.Berkeley.EDU (5.61/1.29)
	id AA06068; Wed, 1 Sep 93 16:59:41 -0700
Resent-From: postman (POSTGRES mailing list)
Resent-Message-Id: <9309012359.AA06068@postgres.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: owner-postman@postgres.Berkeley.EDU
X-Return-Path: wolf@molout.tutkie.tut.ac.jp
Received: from tutkie.tutkie.tut.ac.jp by postgres.Berkeley.EDU (5.61/1.29)
	id AA06058; Wed, 1 Sep 93 16:59:30 -0700
Received: from molout.tutkie.tut.ac.jp by tutkie.tutkie.tut.ac.jp (5.67+1.6W/6.4J.6)
	id AA27295; Thu, 2 Sep 93 09:09:14 JST
Received: by molout.tutkie.tut.ac.jp (4.30/6.4J.6)
	id AA02737; Thu, 2 Sep 93 09:09:39 jst
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 93 09:09:39 jst
From: wolf@molout.tutkie.tut.ac.jp (Wolf-D. Ihlenfeldt)
X-Return-Path: <wolf@molout.tutkie.tut.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <9309020009.AA02737@molout.tutkie.tut.ac.jp>
To: postgres@postgres.berkeley.edu
Subject: Mixing large object functions and postquel ?
Resent-To: postgres-dist
Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 93 16:59:38 PDT




Im am running version 4.1 on Sparc/SunOS4.1.2

Is is allowable to mix calls to libpq large object
functions (such as p_mkdir, p_write) and normal Postquel
functions (such as PQexec("append ...")) within a single transaction
block (begin..end) ? The documentation is not clear on
this point, and I seem to run into some problems if I
do mix those two types of functions:

(void) p_mkdir("/Toolshed",INV_READ|INV_WRITE)

and I get the message:
Error: Unexpected identifier: Cl@

execution completed, exit code is 1
program exited with 1

Or got I something wrong with the (undocumented) p_mkdir() 
function call ?

WDI