Return-Path: aoki
Received: by postgres.Berkeley.EDU (5.61/1.29)
	id AA04280; Sun, 8 Aug 93 19:07:51 -0700
Message-Id: <9308090207.AA04280@postgres.Berkeley.EDU>
From: aoki@postgres.berkeley.edu (Paul M. Aoki)
Subject: Re: postgres data directories
To: postgres@postgres.berkeley.edu
Sender: pg_adm@postgres.berkeley.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 8 Aug 93 16:42:07 -0700 
	     <9308082342.AA03755@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 93 19:15:03 -0700
Sender: aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU
X-Mts: smtp

jaws@pangaea.dme.nt.gov.au (James Woods 61-89-895257) writes:
> I was browsing through the postgres data directories and have noticed that a 
couple of the directories have a whole stack of temp_* files in it.  From gener
al experience any file with temp in it is usually something that is deleted whe
n it has been used.  But these files are 1 - 2 months old.  In one of my databa
ses these files are taking up about 2.5 meg of disk space so I would be interes
ted in knowing if these files should be there.
> Oh and while I'm here in the same databases, at about the same age there are
> a whole load of empty pg_psort* files, If this is of any significance (being
> empty they don't really bother me).

the sortmerge routine evidently has a bug in it such that it *sometimes*
dumps core halfway through a largish join.  (this is the problem that 
bart maessen reported.)

if they're >1 month old, i doubt you have any servers running that
would have them open :-)  nuke 'em.
--
  Paul M. Aoki  |  CS Div., Dept. of EECS, UCB  |  aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU
                |  Berkeley, CA 94720           |  ...!uunet!ucbvax!aoki
