Message-Id: <9305131814.AA03469@postgres.Berkeley.EDU>
From: aoki@postgres.berkeley.edu (Paul M. Aoki)
Subject: developer questions [was: v4r1 vs. v4r0r1]
To: postgres@postgres.berkeley.edu
Sender: pg_adm@postgres.berkeley.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 13 May 93 08:58:22 -0700 
	     <9305131558.AA02037@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Thu, 13 May 93 11:15:02 -0700
Sender: aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU

kuku@acds.physik.rwth-aachen.de (Christoph Kukulies) writes:
> I'd rather prefer a neutral distribution to
> start with, so what is the file to download?

this is admittedly confusing.  the tar files contain the same source 
with different sets of precompiled binaries.  (marc was going to cut 
a source-only version but that keeps getting pushed down on the todo 
list -- he's bug-hunting on the alpha port right now).  so the answer
is -- it doesn't matter.

here's a question for developers.  4.0.1 was also distributed with
a "developers" version that contained our RCS logs.  this may have
provided some people with a few hours of amusement, but the resulting
tar file is three or four times larger than a tar file of the source
tree alone.  did anyone get any use out of this "developer" version?
no one has asked that the equivalent tar be produced for 4.1..
--
  Paul M. Aoki  |  CS Div., Dept. of EECS, UCB  |  aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU
                |  Berkeley, CA 94720           |  ...!uunet!ucbvax!aoki