Message-Id: <9301230727.AA09272@postgres.Berkeley.EDU>
From: aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: Re: < ``arrays of arrays'' >
To: postgres@postgres.berkeley.edu
Sender: pg_adm@postgres.berkeley.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 22 Jan 93 01:21:31 -0800 
	     <9301220921.AA02873@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 23:28:55 -0800
From: aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU

> Could someone explain which versions
> have the array code bug ?
> I re ran the original query on ver 4.0
> and got the following .

Looking back at the RCS log and the date of the 4.0.1 tar file, it 
looks like only 4.0.1 has that particular bug after all.  Sorry to
scare people running old versions.  However, the broken return 
statement (in adt/arrayfunc.c:array_count) has a comment that *it* 
is a fix for a bug in handling *zero*-length arrays, so ...

(BTW, the re-mailing of my last message was due to sendmail reprocessing
some enqueued messages on reboot, not my forgetful nature ..)
--
  Paul M. Aoki  |  CS Div., Dept. of EECS, UCB  |  aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU
                |  Berkeley, CA 94720           |  ...!uunet!ucbvax!aoki