Return-Path: postarch
Received: by postgres.Berkeley.EDU (5.61/1.29)
	id AA09425; Tue, 21 Jul 92 09:37:10 -0700
Message-Id: <9207211637.AA09425@postgres.Berkeley.EDU>
From: postarch (Postgres Mailing Archive)
Subject: Re: security
To: postgres@postgres.berkeley.edu
Sender: pg_adm@postgres.berkeley.edu
Reply-To: mer@postgres.berkeley.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 Jul 92 23:45:01 PDT."
             <9207210645.AA05011@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 92 09:36:47 PDT

you write:
> Postgres 3.x did have security holes (no protection between clients or 
> whatever it was). Does 4.0 have it?

4.0 has the exact same security holes as version 3.1 did.  We are planning
to address security in the next major (non-bugfix) release.


Jeff Meredith
mer@postgres.berkeley.edu