Return-Path: pg_adm@postgres.berkeley.edu Received: by postgres.Berkeley.EDU (5.61/1.29) id AA01705; Thu, 10 Oct 91 11:53:04 -0700 Message-Id: <9110101853.AA01705@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> From: Ed Flowers Subject: Surrogates To: postgres@postgres.berkeley.edu To: postgres@postgres.Berkeley.EDU Date: Thu, 10 Oct 91 11:51:50 PDT Priority: normal X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 CRG PL14c] I've seen alot of mail lately about anomolies with surrogates, or surrogates not working at all. I have ported Postgres 3.0 to System V, and I am seeing similar anomolies. When using the dewitt benchmark to proof my port I always get: > WARN:Oct 10 11:43:12:parser: syntax error at or near "from" where the query is: retrieve into temp (t.all) from t in tenk1 where (t.unique2 > 301) and (t.unique2 < 402) Could I be having a memory management problem, and the parser just reports a syntax error, or is there really a syntax error ?? Has anybody seen this behavior ?? The platform is Sequent Symmetry S/81 running Dynix/ptx 1.3. Thanks in advance, Ed Flowers -- ________________________________________________________________________________ Ed Flowers Internet: edf@sequent.com Software Engineer UUCP: ..!sequent!edf Sequent Computer Systems 15450 S.W. Koll Parkway Phone: (503) 578-5341 Mail Stop RHE2-774 Fax: (503) 578-7569 Beaverton, OR 97006-6063 "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein Disclaimer:"These are my own opinions, except when they ain't" ________________________________________________________________________________